Before the bank acts

Fraud Evidence for Banks

Rule of Record alerts the bank when a payment or account change no longer matches what the customer approved, while the bank can still act. It works beside the systems your bank already runs. The bank makes every final decision.

AI-enabled U.S. fraud losses are projected to grow 32% a year

Deloitte projects $40 billion by 2027. The FBI reported $20.877 billion in internet crime losses in 2025.

32%Projected annual growth in U.S. generative AI-enabled fraud losses, 2023 to 2027
$40BProjected U.S. generative AI-enabled fraud losses by 2027
$20.877BReported internet crime losses in 2025

Sources: Deloitte Center for Financial Services and the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center.

One connected record before the bank pays

A payment request sits in one system. A customer's approval sits in another. The final account details and the bank's decision each live somewhere else too, handled by different teams. Nothing is broken in any single one of those systems. The problem is what happens between them: a mismatch that started in one system can sit there, undetected, until after the bank has already released the funds.

That gap shows up as a real cost. Fraud teams reconstruct what happened after the money is already gone, working across systems that were never built to talk to each other. Banks protect against fraud at login. They protect against it during the transaction too. Then comes the final release, and no single record confirms the last details still match what the customer actually approved. When a customer disputes a payment, or a regulator asks how a decision was made, the record is scattered across teams instead of sitting in one place.

Rule of Record gives the bank a clear finding to review before money moves and one record to examine afterward. The bank keeps control of the decision.

A fraud alert is not the full answer

After an alert, teams still have to search across systems for the request, approval, recipient, and release records. They need those facts to act. If they can only connect them after the funds are sent, the bank and customer must respond to a loss that has already happened.

01Signal

Alert created

A fraud tool flags suspicious activity for review.

02Search

Records opened

Teams locate the request, approval, recipient, and release records.

03Confirmation

Facts connected

The bank compares the records to confirm what changed.

04Consequence

Release already happened

If confirmation comes after release, the bank and customer are responding to a completed loss.

Fraud tools answer different questions

Banks already use tools to check logins, score risk, and manage cases. Each supports a part of fraud review. Rule of Record adds a focused check: do the final payment details still match what the customer approved?

How Rule of Record compares with common fraud technology categories
ControlQuestionOutputTiming
AuthenticationIs this person allowed in?Pass, challenge, or denyAt access
Risk scoring and behavioral analyticsDoes this activity look suspicious?Risk score or alertBefore or during the action
Case managementHow should this alert be investigated?Case, workflow, and dispositionDuring or after review
Rule of RecordDo the final details match what was authorized?Changed field, decision owner, and connected receiptBefore release, when the workflow allows

Category descriptions reflect public product pages from Visa, BioCatch, and NICE Actimize.

Every fraud decision leaves a tamper-evident record

Rule of Record keeps the request, the check, the bank's decision, and the result in one record. A customer may dispute a payment. An examiner may ask about a call. The bank can use the record to show what happened and why.

Decision recordKept in the bank's environment

Rule of Record works from clear rules, not an unexplained AI decision. The bank can review any result later and see why it came out that way.

Bank-controlled
Illustrative fraud control receiptRecipient changed
01Request

$48,200 wire to Northline Supply

Saved
02Flag

Recipient no longer matches what the customer authorized

Changed
03Bank decision

Authorized employee reviews the mismatch

Review
04Outcome

Payment stays in the bank's review queue

Pending
Decision record savedReady for review

The record does not move money or replace the bank's decision. The bank decides.

See what the bank gets

Use your existing systems

Rule of Record works beside existing bank systems without replacing them, while the bank keeps every final decision.

  1. 01
    Connect approved data

    Start with the records the bank approves for evaluation.

  2. 02
    Run beside the current process

    Keep the live workflow as it is while the bank sees the results.

  3. 03
    Return one decision record

    Give authorized teams one decision record. The bank decides.

The software is ready for a bank to evaluate. Before live use, the bank must finish its security, legal, vendor, and production reviews. There is no named bank customer or completed live deployment today.

Review security and deployment

Wire fraud first

The first evaluation focuses on wire fraud. The bank sees when a wire it plans to send no longer matches what the customer approved. Pilot results will guide any move into identity, account, card, or dispute decisions. Expansion depends on that evidence.

FBI-reported business email compromise losses in 2025$3.047BAcross 24,768 complaints
Illustrative calculation

What would a 1% reduction equal?

$3.0466B1%$30.5M

Illustrative arithmetic only. This is not a Rule of Record prevention forecast.

Bring one wire workflow and the bank's own loss data. We will replace the illustrative example above with agreed measures.

Request a demo or pilotRead the wire fraud prevention guide Source: FBI IC3 2025 Annual Report
Request a demo or pilot